G-0ZBBP4213E
Aircraft comparison

Falcon 2000LXS vs Challenger 650

Published figures for the Dassault Falcon 2000LXS and the Bombardier Challenger 650, side by side, with what to weigh beyond the numbers.

Side by side

Published figures

Dassault Falcon 2000LXSBombardier Challenger 650
Range4,000 nm (Mach 0.80, 6 passengers)4,000 nm
PassengersNot stated on the source pageUp to 12
SpeedMach 0.86 maximumMach 0.85 maximum
Engines2 × Pratt & Whitney Canada PW308C2 × GE CF34-3B
Cabin26 ft 2 in L × 6 ft 2 in H × 7 ft 8 in W25 ft 7 in L × 6 ft H × 7 ft 11 in W
In service / certified—Transport Canada certification November 2015
StatusListed in Dassault’s current Falcon family; certified in 2013.Certified by Transport Canada in November 2015. Confirm new-build availability with Bombardier; the pre-owned Challenger 600-series fleet is large.

Figures as published by each model’s sources (see the model pages). Sources may use different conditions, such as passenger load and cruise speed, so small differences are not like-for-like.

Beyond the numbers

What to weigh

  • Your longest regular route with realistic load, not the maximum published range.
  • Cabin layout and floor plan of the specific aircraft, not just the type.
  • New or pre-owned availability, and model succession for out-of-production types.
  • Maintenance programme status, which can outweigh differences between types.
  • Crew availability for each type in your region.
Notes

Falcon 2000LXS

  • A wide cabin with 4,000 nm range, for owners who want large-cabin comfort without ultra-long-range costs.
  • Several Falcon 2000 variants exist; confirm the exact variant.

Challenger 650

  • The latest of the long-running Challenger 600 series; earlier 604 and 605 aircraft share the family.
  • A wide cabin (7 ft 11 in) for a 4,000 nm aircraft.
EDAERO Aircraft Transactions

Deciding between the Falcon 2000LXS and Challenger 650?

Speak directly with Adrian Mihailovici. Your message arrives on WhatsApp, already written for you.